Forums › Forums › Search & Filter Pro › Result accuracy

Tagged: , ,

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 13 total)
1 2
  • Trevor
    (Private)  January 27, 2017 at 10:33 am #86004

    I think this may be the way that WordPress treats symbols and thus it may be breaking the terms down into smaller words.

    The only alternative is to try installing relevanssi and seeing if enabling that (in the S&F Form Advanced settings) makes a difference (in some installations, it is also necessary to tell relevanssi to index and search in excerpts).

    Are these chemicals also tags, as you can ask Relevanssi to search categories, tags etc.

    Anonymous
    (Private)  January 27, 2017 at 10:58 am #86016

    Hi Trevor
    I have relevanssi installed and have been using it. It does not seem to make a difference, it is set to search in excerpts.

    Searching for the title does not seems to work.

    As another example searching for p-Methoxycarbonylaminobenzenesulfonamide

    does not find that result, searching for Methoxycarbonylaminobenzenesulfonamide returns no results

    this is the actual page http://www.eppltd.com/products/p-methoxycarbonylaminobenzenesulfonamide

    Trevor
    (Private)  January 27, 2017 at 11:05 am #86018

    Are these long words mainly in the titles, and if so, did you add a weight to titles (like 1000 or even higher)?

    Anonymous
    (Private)  January 27, 2017 at 11:16 am #86028

    Hi Trevor
    I have adjusted the weight for titles to 2000 then tried 3000, neither made a difference

    Trevor
    (Private)  January 27, 2017 at 11:18 am #86030

    I am not sure what is going on then. It might be an idea to post on the wordpress relevanssi support page. What happens if you do not use relevanssi?

    Anonymous
    (Private)  January 27, 2017 at 11:21 am #86032

    the reindexing for relevanssi wasn’t working properly but has since saved, it’s a lot better now, searching for N-(4′-Chlorobiphenyl-2-yl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carboxamide does return in the results, just that it’s 4th in the list when the expectation would be that it’s returned first?

    Trevor
    (Private)  January 27, 2017 at 12:22 pm #86035

    As I said, I am not sure. It may be the sheer length of the ‘words’ that is the issue.

    Anonymous
    (Private)  January 27, 2017 at 3:14 pm #86073
    This reply has been marked as private.
    Trevor
    (Private)  January 27, 2017 at 3:20 pm #86075

    This could be all manner of things. Those symbols might well be reserved. Given the number of symbols being used, this may happen on other symbols too.

    Anonymous
    (Private)  January 27, 2017 at 3:27 pm #86077
    This reply has been marked as private.
  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 13 total)
1 2