Forums Forums Search Search Results for 'woocommerce'

Viewing 10 results - 171 through 180 (of 1,497 total)
  • Author
    Search Results

  • Trevor
    Participant

    We have received feature requests to allow the one form to be broken into parts to be placed (and styled) in different places (and differently styled) on the page.

    We have taken those requests on board for our forthcoming V3 (which we hope to release in a few months – but that may flex a little as we polish the code and UI). For example, you might have a form in WooCommerce that has a Search Box (text field), a Sort Order drop down, and then other fields (Product Categories, Product Tags, Variations, etc). You will be able to place the Search Box in the header, and the Sort Order above the products, and the rest of the form in the sidebar.

    But, that is not possible right now, sorry.


    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi, we are in the dev process. Yes, using WooCommerce and product archive. Here is the actual woocommerce “shop” page with all products:

    http://dev.rockymountainwinespiritsbeer.com/shop/

    I’d like the wine page to just show the wine category and then just use the wine specific filters.

    http://dev.rockymountainwinespiritsbeer.com/wine/

    I’m sure I’m just not configuring this correctly. How do I get just the wine to show and filter on this page?

    The other alternative is to just have one shop page but if you were to select “wine” then I don’t want “beer style” to show as a filter. That might be easier but I’m not sure how to do that. Hopefully it makes sense what I’m trying to do.

    Thanks for your help.


    Trevor
    Participant

    The logins do not work for me? Do you have IP or country security on it maybe, or check the username or password?

    The forms is set to use the ‘As an Archive’ method. As a WooCommerce site, I expected it to use that method, and for it to take the user to the shop page? For WooCommerce the Ajax Container is often .products


    Trevor
    Participant

    How complete is the site, or are you just starting to build it? Correct post, taxonomy and data structure are vital to make your design process much easier.

    Are you using WooCommerce?

    Are you using the Elementor product archive elements?

    Can you give me links to the Wine and Beer pages?

    #253677

    Trevor
    Participant

    The NOT IN parts will be what you have set in the form, possibly as excludes. Our queries are preprocessed so that we send the request in a way which is fastest for the server to be able to respond to. It does this by restricting the request to matching POST IDs (in the example about 130 posts).

    When comparing WordPress sites that have:

    Simple text search and/or ordering

    to ones where the users will be doing complex filtering, there will be a huge difference in CPU and Hard Drive usage.

    The server configuration will be key here. If it is not configured for this type of usage, then it will struggle. I have many hosting packages configured for basic WordPress sites that are very fast and have low resource usage. It allows the hosting company to oversell these resources. I have seen some hosts that offer Managed WordPress servers with and without WooCommerce, where there is no difference in configuration.

    In my view, all hosting should be configured assuming heavy database use, and be configured in such a way as to keep CPU and Hard Drive usage optimised. Sadly, this is not the case.

    Hosts do oversell resources, especially on Shared Hosting and on VPSs. And they frequently do not optimise the server setup (software). Whenever I see a standard Customer Control Panel (like WHM/cPanel, or Plesk), I know this will be so. It is so expensive to maintain high performing server software setups, that very few hosts do it. Even of those that do, such as Cloudways, WP Engine, Flywheel, Siteground, are cost centric compromises, but at their performance isn’t bad. Only one host truly ticks all the boxes though, and that is Kinsta.

    Users (ones I have spoken to on this performance topic – it comes up from time to time across the year) who try them are often stunned at the performance difference.

    In summary, the queries we generate are as optimized as they can be. Given a good hosting server, they should not be placing high load on server resources.


    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The plugin, with woocommerce and wpml, seems doesn’t work. Work correct in the main language (EN) but when the filter populate other language (like ES) is not correct. Show only part of the correct option in the dropdown.
    When cache the result show more option (but not all the correct option), but after it finish to cache show only little option in the dropdown.
    Can you help us?
    Thanks

    #253617

    Anonymous
    Inactive

    +———————————————–+———-+——————————+———-+
    | name | status | update | version |
    +———————————————–+———-+——————————+———-+
    | acf-to-rest-api | active | available | 3.2.0 |
    | aryo-activity-log | active | none | 2.5.2 |
    | advanced-custom-fields | active | none | 5.8.12 |
    | agile-store-locator-google-maps-for-wordpress | active | version higher than expected | 4.5.5 |
    | booster-plus-for-woocommerce | active | available | 5.0.0 |
    | wp-defender | active | none | 2.3 |
    | duracelltomi-google-tag-manager | active | none | 1.11.4 |
    | gravityforms | active | available | 2.4.18 |
    | groups | active | none | 2.10.0 |
    | redirection | active | none | 4.8 |
    | regenerate-thumbnails | active | none | 3.1.3 |
    | search-filter-pro | active | none | 2.5.1 |
    | simple-sitemap | active | none | 3.5 |
    | wp-smush-pro | active | none | 3.6.3 |
    | kahanit-tablerateshipping | active | none | 1.2.1 |
    | user-role-editor | active | none | 4.55.1 |
    | velvet-blues-update-urls | active | none | 3.2.9 |
    | woocommerce | active | available | 4.2.2 |
    | woocommerce-catalog-enquiry-pro | active | none | 1.1.5 |
    | woocommerce-dynamic-pricing | active | none | 3.1.13 |
    | woocommerce-gateway-payment-express | active | none | 3.0 |
    | woocommerce-sequential-order-numbers | active | none | 1.9.5 |
    | woocommerce-shipping-multiple-addresses | active | none | 3.6.6 |
    | woocommerce-tm-extra-product-options | active | available | 5.0.12.2 |
    | woosidebars | active | none | 1.4.5 |
    | wpmudev-updates | active | none | 4.9.4 |
    | wp-rocket | active | available | 3.6.1 |
    | wordpress-seo | active | available | 14.4.1 |
    +———————————————–+———-+——————————+———-+

    Among our plugins installed in our site, search-filter-pro consumes a lot of resources in our server.
    Our DevOps is tagging this query that was generated by your plugin.
    | 26579 | safesusr | 10.136.184.160:49444 | safes_db | Query | 578 | Sending data | SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS 4hW1Q_posts.ID FROM 4hW1Q_posts INNER JOIN 4hW1Q_postmeta ON ( 4hW1Q_posts.ID = 4hW1Q_postmeta.post_id ) INNER JOIN 4hW1Q_postmeta AS mt1 ON ( 4hW1Q_posts.ID = mt1.post_id ) LEFT JOIN 4hW1Q_wc_product_meta_lookup wc_product_meta_lookup ON 4hW1Q_posts.ID = wc_product_meta_lookup.product_id WHERE 1=1 AND 4hW1Q_posts.ID IN (30079,30080,30081,30084,30085,30086,30087,30088,30128,30129,30130,30145,30161,30164,30165,30984,31286,31287,31299,31303,31413,31862,31865,31866,32634,32635,32642,32643,32674,32684,32689,32690,32704,32705,32706,32707,32720,33465,33479,33480,32664,32665,32672,32673,32688,32700,30163,30104,30105,30106,30107,30108,30109,30110,30111,30112,30113,30114,30115,30116,30118,30119,30120,30121,30122,30123,30125,30126,30127,30133,30139,30140,30141,30142,30143,30144,30986,30146,30147,30148,30149,30150,30987,30988,30989,30990,30151,30152,30153,30991,30154,30155,30156,30157,30158,30159,30160,30162,30167,30168,30101,30102,30103,30131,30132,31300,31301,31302,31417,32652,30096,30097,30082,30083,30089,30090,30091,30092,30094,30095,32656,32657,30099,30100) AND (
    4hW1Q_posts.ID NOT IN (
    SELECT object_id
    FROM 4hW1Q_term_relationships
    WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (28)
    )
    AND
    4hW1Q_posts.ID NOT IN (
    SELECT object_id
    FROM 4hW1Q_term_relationships
    WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (131)
    )

    Is there any way that this could be minimized? Or avoid using NOT IN in the query?


    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi~ I have this little question~
    I’m displaying my products by review counts now.
    but I want to show the Woocommerce products result by bookable schedule first, review counts second.
    so if there have a product that has 4 reviews but not available to book right now, it still will sort behind a bookable product that has 3 reviews.
    I had tried to use meta value “_wc_booking_availability” and others that have “_wc_” meta, don’t know why its not working…
    hope I can get the answer here, woocommerce’s support told me to require on here.
    thanks!

    #253322

    Trevor
    Participant

    Category and Tag in WooCommerce are not Post category and Post Tag. Instead, they are custom taxonomies. For each, did you drag Taxonomy to the forum UI, and then select Product Category and Product Tag?

    For price, this will be a custom field, so a Post Meta object must be dragged to the form. Initially, to make sure you have the correct meta key name (I think it is normally _price), set the field to Choice and see what options show in the front end when you open the page with the form on.

    #253242

    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi Trevor,

    Thanks for the tip, however it still doesn’t work.

    What you have here is basically what I’m after:
    https://demo.designsandcode.com/sfpro-woo-mystile/product-category/posters/

    So I need filters for **Category**, **Tag** and a slider for **Price**

    I am using Storefront theme for WooCommerce.

    Is this achievable with your plugin?

    Thanks
    Warren

Viewing 10 results - 171 through 180 (of 1,497 total)